see the distribution of results (graph)
Speed Test Statistics| « Back to speed test statistics |
|
see the distribution of results (graph) |
domain sbcglobal.netOrdered by descending tested download speed Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included | |||||||
| |||||||
| Speed Dwn/up | Claimed ISP & Speed | User Location | Test | Day Hour (EST) | Company & Domain | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55/181 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Dayton, OH, USA | California, USA | 3rd 08:34 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.dytnoh.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 54/628 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | rhf @ Davis, CA, USA | California, USA | 17th 08:45 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net | ||
| Comment: | AT&T "Elite" DSL! U 2 can pay $35/mo for 54Kbps download! | ||||||
| 50/195 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Riverside, CA, USA | California, USA | 8th 07:04 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.lsan03.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 49/269 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ La Marque, TX, USA | (flash speedtest) | 18th 06:54 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 49/269 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ La Marque, TX, USA | (flash speedtest) | 18th 06:57 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 48/272 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Lake Villa, IL, USA | (flash speedtest) | 27th 10:16 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 46/439 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Westland, MI, USA | (flash speedtest) | 31st 01:01 AM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 45/291 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon | (flash speedtest) | 25th 09:14 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 43/702 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon | (flash speedtest) | 5th 12:45 AM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 42/561 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Fremont, CA, USA | California, USA | 5th 01:57 AM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 39/308 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Lancaster, OH, USA | (flash speedtest) | 11th 11:07 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 38/385 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Modesto, CA, USA | (flash speedtest) | 9th 09:50 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 38/385 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Modesto, CA, USA | (flash speedtest) | 9th 09:50 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 36/322 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Chicago, IL, USA | (flash speedtest) | 7th 11:49 AM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) sbcglobal.net | ||
| 33/26 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | sfbaddog @ San Francisco, CA, USA | California, USA | 29th 11:10 AM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 32/16 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Houston, TX, USA | New Jersey, USA | 24th 02:36 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 31/642 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Granite City, IL, USA | California, USA | 9th 08:43 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.covlil.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 26/72 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Palatine, IL, USA | California, USA | 28th 02:38 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 26/20 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ San Francisco, CA, USA | California, USA | 29th 03:30 AM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 24/130 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Chicago, IL, USA | California, USA | 8th 05:36 AM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 14/25 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Los Angeles, CA, USA | California, USA | 15th 03:21 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.lsan03.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 11/12 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ San Francisco, CA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 29th 09:55 AM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 11/643 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Newhall, CA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 4th 11:34 AM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) dsl.lsan03.sbcglobal.net | ||
| 8/16 | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) | anon @ Loves Park, IL, USA | New Jersey, USA | 20th 08:02 PM | SBC/AT&T (Prodigy) lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net | ||
| disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower. | |||||||
