Speed Test Statistics| « Back to speed test statistics |
AT&TSee: reviews and info for AT&T (Business Services) Ordered by descending tested download speed Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included | ||||||
| Speed Dwn/up | Claimed ISP & Speed | User Location | Test | Day Hour (EST) | Company & Domain | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.6m/23.5m | AT&T | anon | California, USA | 19th 06:03 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 15.6m/16.8m | AT&T | anon @ Addison, TX, USA | California, USA | 10th 12:13 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 11.9m/17.7m | AT&T | anon @ Lompoc, CA, USA | California, USA | 2nd 01:08 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 8.3m/16.1m | AT&T | anon @ Los Angeles, CA, USA | California, USA | 4th 03:55 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 7.8m/2m | AT&T | anon @ Lincoln, CA, USA | (flash speedtest) | 31st 07:33 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 7.4m/11.2m | AT&T | anon @ Gastonia, NC, USA | California, USA | 30th 09:29 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 6.7m/5.4m | AT&T | anon | (flash speedtest) | 15th 11:14 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 6.5m/1.2m | AT&T | anon @ Nashville, TN, USA | (flash speedtest) | 20th 08:20 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 6.3m/4m | AT&T | anon @ Miami, FL, USA | (flash speedtest) | 9th 03:03 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 6.3m/9.1m | AT&T | anon | New Jersey, USA | 28th 03:57 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 5.8m/7.8m | AT&T | anon | California, USA | 26th 04:37 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 4.8m/952 | Allegiance.tv 6m/1000 | anon @ Mena, AR, USA | (flash speedtest) | 5th 09:50 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 3.2m/390 | xipline | bcflake @ Munford, TN, USA | (flash speedtest) | 1st 06:15 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 3.1m/383 | AT&T | bcflake @ Munford, TN, USA | (flash speedtest) | 6th 08:07 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| Comment: | Xipline | ||||||
| 3m/1.7m | AT&T | anon | (flash speedtest) | 14th 03:13 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 2.6m/2.5m | AT&T | anon | California, USA | 28th 01:29 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 2.4m/410 | AT&T | bcflake @ Munford, TN, USA | (flash speedtest) | 1st 06:20 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 2.3m/535 | AT&T 3m/512 | anon @ Morrisdale, PA, USA | (flash speedtest) | 27th 11:04 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 2.2m/1.1m | AT&T | anon @ Dallas, TX, USA | (flash speedtest) | 2nd 03:50 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1.4m/1.4m | AT&T | anon @ 90340 | California, USA | 19th 11:20 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1.3m/1.3m | AT&T | anon @ Chino, CA, USA | California, USA | 4th 04:03 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1.3m/1.3m | AT&T | anon | (flash speedtest) | 1st 03:47 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1.3m/1.2m | AT&T | anon | (flash speedtest) | 1st 03:42 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1.3m/1.4m | AT&T | anon @ Birch Run, MI, USA | (flash speedtest) | 13th 10:23 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1.3m/613 | AT&T | anon @ Pelham, AL, USA | (flash speedtest) | 20th 06:48 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1.2m/1m | AT&T | anon @ Pelham, AL, USA | (flash speedtest) | 20th 06:51 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1.2m/267 | AT&T | anon @ Phoenix, AZ, USA | California, USA | 20th 01:35 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1.2m/784 | AT&T | anon @ Charlotte, NC, USA | (flash speedtest) | 2nd 09:46 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 1m/268 | AT&T | anon @ 99999 | California, USA | 15th 08:17 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 977/1.2m | AT&T | anon | California, USA | 3rd 11:44 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 690/369 | AT&T | anon | California, USA | 8th 12:31 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 675/756 | AT&T | anon | California, USA | 9th 06:40 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 660/1.3m | AT&T | anon | California, USA | 1st 03:45 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 531/3m | AT&T | anon @ Fort Benning, GA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 21st 02:56 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 477/2m | AT&T | anon @ Fort Drum, NY, USA | New Jersey, USA | 8th 06:40 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 441/1.2m | AT&T | ktarn @ Saxonburg, PA, USA | (flash speedtest) | 28th 06:39 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| Comment: | hammpton Inn | ||||||
| 419/203 | AT&T | anon @ Hico, TX, USA | (flash speedtest) | 14th 09:30 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 383/64 | AT&T | anon @ Colfax, CA, USA | California, USA | 27th 09:31 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 310/83 | AT&T | anon @ Salem, OR, USA | (flash speedtest) | 11th 09:29 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 299/414 | AT&T | anon @ San Diego, CA, USA | (flash speedtest) | 23rd 05:12 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 298/1.4m | AT&T | anon @ Mission, TX, USA | New Jersey, USA | 14th 02:10 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 289/240 | AT&T 768/- | anon @ Tenakee Springs, AK, USA | speedtest.nwc.acsalaska.net | 4th 10:10 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 275/11.3m | AT&T | anon @ El Segundo, CA, USA | California, USA | 8th 06:32 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 268/118 | AT&T | anon @ Colfax, CA, USA | California, USA | 20th 08:09 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 267/593 | AT&T | anon @ Torrance, CA, USA | California, USA | 27th 08:59 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 267/156 | AT&T | anon @ Colfax, CA, USA | California, USA | 18th 02:44 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 257/305 | AT&T | anon @ Clarence, NY, USA | (flash speedtest) | 30th 10:09 AM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 202/56 | AT&T | anon | (flash speedtest) | 25th 09:29 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 174/186 | AT&T | anon | California, USA | 21st 09:47 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 170/376 | AT&T | anon | (flash speedtest) | 8th 07:57 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 151/137 | AT&T | anon @ Rising Sun, IN, USA | (flash speedtest) | 7th 06:05 PM | AT&T att.net | ||
| 44/20 | AT&T | anon @ Brookhaven, MS, USA | California, USA | 8th 01:30 PM | AT&T dallas-22rh15rt.tx.dial-access.att.net | ||
| 44/20 | AT&T | anon @ Brookhaven, MS, USA | California, USA | 8th 01:29 PM | AT&T dallas-22rh15rt.tx.dial-access.att.net | ||
| disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower. | |||||||