[DVR] DVR not hurting networks for commercial viewing Page 2
Links: home · search · speed test · login · more ·

 
Links: Reply New Topic
Forums » Comcast » Comcast Cable TV » [DVR] DVR not hurting networks for commercial viewing
page: 1 · 2
TKJunkMail @ 5th Nov 07:43PM:
Re: [DVR] DVR not hurting networks for commercial viewing

said by joker5656 :

said by JohnInSJ :

What's a commercial?

Embedded advertising is the future.
when that happens or i should say gets more annoying i will cancel my cable. Some shows already do the in show advertising. they usuallyy take up 1/3 of the bottom of the screen.
Embedded advertising is OK by me, if it doesn't become overly intrusive.

If all cars are Fords or Toyotas in a show I won't care. Or if the drink on the cops desk is a McDonalds cup or a Starbucks large coffee, then OK too. But if the dialog of a character includes "I love my Chevy" 10 x in a half hour, then that is going too far.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page



reply
joker5656 @ 5th Nov 09:23PM:
Re: [DVR] DVR not hurting networks for commercial viewing

No what i was refering to was when you watch a show and they show another semi comercial at the bottom for another show. thats BS
reply
TKJunkMail @ 5th Nov 09:36PM:
Re: [DVR] DVR not hurting networks for commercial viewing

said by joker5656 :

No what i was refering to was when you watch a show and they show another semi comercial at the bottom for another show. thats BS
I agree. I hate those dancing animations some networks allow to be in the bottom left corner of a running show.
reply
Curlee @ 5th Nov 10:06PM:
Re: [DVR] DVR not hurting networks for commercial viewing

said by darcilicious :

... more with STB "widgets" that interface twitter and facebook...
Oh, hold me back! (laugh ... I use neither).
reply
Curlee @ 5th Nov 10:37PM:
Re: [DVR] DVR not hurting networks for commercial viewing

said by bicker :

Essentially, advertisers are beginning to realize that, and advertising rates are beginning to fall. That will make less and less money available for television production, regardless of equivocations.
Perhaps, but I suspect rates for well scripted shows will fall less than for "reality".

said by bicker :

This is and shall continue to prompt less and less scripted programming on OTA broadcast television, and will prompt a move to put scripted programming behind the fence of subscription fees, which is a more reliable revenue stream (i.e., to cable networks.)
For years I've ignored the national networks, but lately I've been surprised by shows like ABC's Defying Gravity, and Fox's Fringe.

If a subscription becomes necessary for scripted shows, then I'll try drop the basic cable drivel and use that money for those premium channels instead.

Anything to avoid "reality" shows.
reply

Thank you for using lo-fi dslreports.com - report bugs
© 99-2009 silver matrix LLC