Is my "free" cable box really free?
Links: home · search · speed test · login · more ·
Links:
Forums » Comcast » Comcast Cable TV » Is my "free" cable box really free?
page: 1 · 2 · 3
cybrsk8r6 @ 3rd Nov 01:39PM:
Is my "free" cable box really free?
Last winter I got a come-on from CC to get a free digital upgrade and free cable box for a year. Low and behold, they started charging me rental after two months. I turned the box back in because the pixelation problems I thought the box would fix were still there.
Now they tell me I'm REQUIRED to get a cable box and DTA in order to get my current level of service here in the DC burbs. It would seem logical to me that if I'm required to have the box by the end of the month, they can't charge rental on the basic cable box anymore, but I'm not going to assume that. They may try to charge rental as a sort of backdoor rate increase.
The info on the digital transition said the cable box and DTA were free. Not free for 6 months, or free for a year. It said free.
So the question is, can CC charge for a cable box I'm required to have to get the channels I'm paying for?
reply
gar187er @ 3rd Nov 01:50PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
sure can charge you...generally its after the first box they charge for....
reply
RalphKramden @ 3rd Nov 02:25PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by cybrsk8r6 :
The info on the digital transition said the cable box and DTA were free. Not free for 6 months, or free for a year. It said free.
So the question is, can CC charge for a cable box I'm required to have to get the channels I'm paying for?
They can do whatever they want. And you can either subscribe or not.
reply
ak3883 @ 3rd Nov 02:55PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Nothing is "free", you are just paying for it as part of paying for your cable package.
The first cable box(SD only) is included with digital starter service, which now costs the same as expanded basic. 2 DTAs are included as well for no extra cost.
reply
rendrenner @ 3rd Nov 02:59PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Your are not required to get the box. The lower local channels (usually 2-28 ish) will still come through.
Why is everyone suprised by the transition to a box on every tv? I remember when we first got cable at my house back around 1980 or so.. Had a box on every TV. Thats the way it was and we dealt with it. At least now you get a remote control, all I could use back then was my 4 year old brother.
reply
insomniac @ 3rd Nov 03:02PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
The difference back then was that, eventually, you could get a "cable-ready" TV and get rid of the box, allowing you to use cable TV without any company-owned equipment. Now that's no longer an option. The closest you can get is owning a CableCARD-capable TV and getting a card.
--
If everything seems to be going well, you've obviously overlooked something.
reply
Curlee @ 3rd Nov 03:04PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Here, just before the digital transition, basic digital cost $1 more per month than basic analog. So I believe Comcast was offering to provide digital (including SD cable box and up to 2 DTAs) for the price you were paying for analog.
Except for any general annual rate increase, you should be paying what you were before. If not, you need to complain to Comcast.
If your bill is itemized, you should not expect the rental charge for the cable box to be zero. What counts is the total.
reply
beavercable @ 3rd Nov 03:22PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Is it a regular standard definition or is it a high definition box? And how much are they charging you for it?
reply
dishrich @ 3rd Nov 03:35PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by rendrenner :
Why is everyone suprised by the transition to a box on every tv? I remember when we first got cable at my house back around 1980 or so.. Had a box on every TV.
Sorry, but it was NEVER like that for many of us on cable - EVEN for premium channels! And there are still many cable systems that do NOT require their converter box for ANY analog services, such as this company here:
»web2.casscomm.com/cable/index.html
ALL analog premiums are trapped at the pole/box (either via negative or positive trapping) & they still offer 6 analog premiums in spite of this on most of their systems.
You ONLY need a box if you want to upgrade to digital service - & of course, you do NOT have to do this on EVERY set in the house; the rest will still get their full analog lineup, including any analog premiums.
Also, you ARE aware that some co like TWC & Cox still advertise their advantage over DBS of "NO boxes needed for expanded basic service" - of course, they also went the route of SDV, so they would NOT have to require boxes for analog expanded basic subs.
reply
rendrenner @ 3rd Nov 03:48PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
I dont recall saying that my case applied to everyone, but saying that is was NEVER like that for many of us is a bit more of a blanket statement. I'd be quite suprised if a majority of the current cable customers can say that they have never had to have a box to get their cable TV. I would see that may be different for some of the younger crowd out there who have always grown up with cable ready TV's but they werent always that way. Who remembers the cable boxes with the wired remotes?
The way TV is delivered is changing. TV's had to be changed to become cable ready with tuners that can go up to chn 125. Tv's now have the Digital tuners added and the next step would be to just make the cable card slot a standard. Broadcast TV changed how tv's wired by going all digital. What happens when channels start dropping their SD feeds?
reply
willpick @ 3rd Nov 06:05PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
When i moved to florida in '78, Comcast was the cable company for my town. you HAD to have an STB for each TV, no matter if you had premium channels or not. They did come with remote controls, but all it did was change the channel. Only had 75 or so channels including the premium ones.
Then Comcast left due to non renewal of the franchise agreement(CC wanted 30-40% more money). Adelphia stepped in, upgraded the system, and unscrambled every channel except the premiums and added PPV movies, sports, concerts & wrestling PPV. You only needed an STB if you had the "extra stuff".
Adelphia went bankrupt, CC came back, and it's been status quo until now. I don't know how long it's gonna take CC to switch us over, but I'm gonna wait and see how much bother it will be. If I get Po'ed enough, well DTV is a viable alternative-- of the 16 houses on my block, only 6 still have cable. The rest have satellite, and are pretty satisfied with it.
As to what happens if SD goes away-- well, then there will only be HD, and you will need an HD box or DVR to see anything other than the OTA channels that you can recieve.
reply
anon @ 3rd Nov 06:23PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Yeah, I got the same "free" offer of STB & DTA. Yet, my bill for current service is going up $1.99 a month....hmmm...it doesn't feel like free
reply
rody_44 @ 3rd Nov 07:16PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
People of philadelphia has needed a box since the dawn of day. It had nothing to do with a cable ready tv.
reply
Joe12345678 @ 3rd Nov 09:06PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by willpick :
As to what happens if SD goes away-- well, then there will only be HD, and you will need an HD box or DVR to see anything other than the OTA channels that you can recieve.
replace SD with analog cable and soon you will need a DTA, cable box, cable card or tru2way system to get anything other then OTA as all other digital will be scrambled.
reply
bicker @ 4th Nov 06:47AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
As per federal regulations, digital "cable-ready" is provided for. However, consumers have been generally unwilling to do their part, refusing (when originally offered in 2005) to spend the extra money for the compatible equipment. Consumers are a lot cheaper these days, and until enough consumers are willing to pay the extra money to justify including CableCARD slots in televisions, those offerings are going to remain a rarity. However, there are options if you are one of the very few consumers who really, sincerely want a digital "cable-ready" (no box) solution, and are not just looking to whine about something.
reply
patryan9 @ 4th Nov 07:36AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
"Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door"
Conversely, build a crappy mousetrap (1 way cablecard with half-hearted support from the cable co's.) and consumers will ignore you.
Ask a cable installer in your area (as I do every other year or so since 2004 when I got my cablecard TV) about cablecard and he'll dissuade you from trying it.
The items that they'll hang their hat on are that it's buggy to install and you'll get no more guide data or VOD.
Cable companies have sabotaged cablecard because it'll cost them a few dollars per month per subscriber in box rental fees.
reply
jasg @ 4th Nov 10:08AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Ok, the last two posts point fingers at consumers and cablecos for the failure of Cablecard. In my mind, there are at least two other players who dropped the ball...
- the design from CableLabs probably could have been more robust and simpler to implement.
- the CE companies could have offered Cablecard support where it would have been most useful, on the smaller sets for bedrooms and kitchens (aka 'occasional' TVs). Offering them on the larger, primary sets where a cable box was not as objectionable missed what I think was the real market.
It will be interesting to see if this repeats with tru2way...
reply
neufuse @ 4th Nov 11:57AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
repeats? tru2way is pretty much dead it seems like....
reply
bicker @ 4th Nov 01:50PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by patryan9 :
"Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door"
"A stitch in time saves nine."
That and three dollars will get you a cup of coffee.
said by patryan9 :
Conversely, build a crappy mousetrap (1 way cablecard with half-hearted support from the cable co's.) and consumers will ignore you.
The question in this thread is whether people find having CableCARD-compatible televisions better than having a box. Which is it?
said by patryan9 :
Cable companies have sabotaged cablecard because it'll cost them a few dollars per month per subscriber in box rental fees.
That's a cop-out. I've got a CableCARD-compatible DVR. It works fine. Make up some other excuse.
reply
bicker @ 4th Nov 01:51PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by neufuse :
repeats? tru2way is pretty much dead it seems like....
Maybe maybe not, but if it is it is a reflection of consumers not really caring that much about what some other people in this thread insist that consumers care about.
reply
GTFan @ 4th Nov 02:41PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by jasg :
Ok, the last two posts point fingers at consumers and cablecos for the failure of Cablecard. In my mind, there are at least two other players who dropped the ball...
- the design from CableLabs probably could have been more robust and simpler to implement.
- the CE companies could have offered Cablecard support where it would have been most useful, on the smaller sets for bedrooms and kitchens (aka 'occasional' TVs). Offering them on the larger, primary sets where a cable box was not as objectionable missed what I think was the real market.
It will be interesting to see if this repeats with tru2way...
Well, yeah. It's kind of obvious what happened with CCs when you STILL need a truck roll in most areas to pair up a card. But somehow, Comcast implemented a simple website for DTAs where you can have them ship them to you and then activate them yourself.
The difference being, of course, that the CE companies had to roll their own Cablecard stuff and so the cableCos didn't trust the implementation (or the consumer) because it wasn't their equipment.
So, what was the point of having CableLabs certification again?
reply
rendrenner @ 4th Nov 03:06PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
DTA's and cable card driven boxes call all be activated at the consumer level because Comcat already has all of the info pertaining to the equipment. Comcast already knows the host and data ID info for the cards installed in their own box.
I dont doubt that most tech minded consumers could sucessfully pull off a cable card install. However Comcast isnt able to select who their customers are, and the same ones failing on keeping the tv channel on 3 or 4, remembering how to turn off the SAP are going to be the same people who wont be able to access the pairing screen to set up the card. Yes it is listed in the manuel, but again so is many other useful information and truck rolls for NOAA weather coming through on their favorite soaps still happen.
Those will also be the same customers that stomp their feet cover their ears and scream at the top of their lungs that their TV does not need a firmware update to make the cable card work properly.
reply
cybrsk8r6 @ 4th Nov 03:33PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
If the cable companies are going to require STBs or DTAs to get a full channel line-up, then they should also be required to allow customers to buy their own boxes, similar to the way it works with modems. While the box would belong to you, the company would activate it and program it for whatever service level you're paying for. When you move the company would de-program the box so it wouldn't work on their system anymore. Of course, I'm sure the cable companies will think up many, many reasons why this just won't work.
reply
bicker @ 4th Nov 03:58PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by cybrsk8r6 :
If the cable companies are going to require STBs or DTAs to get a full channel line-up, then they should also be required to allow customers to buy their own boxes, similar to the way it works with modems.
They are required to, and they do allow customers to.
said by cybrsk8r6 :
While the box would belong to you, the company would activate it and program it for whatever service level you're paying for.
That's exactly what CableCARD does. This has all been discussed, at the highest levels, and standards outlined. It's already in the marketplace. I know, because I have a CableCARD-compatible DVR which I own myself, and it works great.
reply
caddyroger @ 4th Nov 04:30PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
You can own your box.There TiVo and Moxie right now. If the manufacture don make them then you are out of luck. The cable cards take care of what programming you get. Blame Philips Toshiba Sony and the others for not building the boxes. How many people would want to pay $300.00 plus for a box.
--
Caddy
reply
bicker @ 4th Nov 05:41PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
(I think the boxes, themselves, would retail for closer to $200.)
reply
caddyroger @ 4th Nov 05:47PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
From what I am reading on the TiVo forums the TiVo HD the cheapest, cost TiVo around $400 to build but they are selling them at $300.00. I think It more like $300 then $200 but that my opinion.
--
Caddy
reply
bicker @ 4th Nov 07:01PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
That's a dual-tuner DVR, not just a single-tuner cable box. Also, note that the TiVo HD actually runs about $700 total, because it will not work without subscription. The TiVo is priced below cost, and the subscription subsidizes the cost of the box. So start with $700 and work backwards to get to the appropriate price for "just a cable box" (remove the hard drive, the second tuner, and a few other bits).
Again... figure $200. That's a pretty reliable figure, from what I've read.
reply
caddyroger @ 4th Nov 07:05PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Sorry for a Plain Jane box it probably would only cost $200.00 or less.
--
Caddy
reply
bicker @ 5th Nov 05:56AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
And I really doubt there will be any market, ever, for a premium, personally-owned cable box, without either it also being a DVR (TiVo @ $700; Moxi @ $800), or perhaps being something like a Roku HD box (and I'd figure that would come in at your $300 price point, or perhaps even a little lower).
reply
patryan9 @ 5th Nov 12:19PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
I don't drink coffee.
said by bicker :said by patryan9 :
Conversely, build a crappy mousetrap (1 way cablecard with half-hearted support from the cable co's.) and consumers will ignore you.
The question in this thread is whether people find having CableCARD-compatible televisions better than having a box. Which is it?
"Better" depends on the application doesn't it? Living room/want DVR >I pick box, bedroom/lcd handing on the wall>cablecard.
said by patryan9 :said by bicker :
Cable companies have sabotaged cablecard because it'll cost them a few dollars per month per subscriber in box rental fees.
That's a cop-out. I've got a CableCARD-compatible DVR. It works fine. Make up some other excuse.
ok... we know that 1 works and was installed fine. How does that scale over all of the Comcast universe? I think your statistical sample of 1 is too small (but that's just me).
reply
gchris2203 @ 5th Nov 01:53PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by patryan9 :
"Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door"
Conversely, build a crappy mousetrap (1 way cablecard with half-hearted support from the cable co's.) and consumers will ignore you.
Ask a cable installer in your area (as I do every other year or so since 2004 when I got my cablecard TV) about cablecard and he'll dissuade you from trying it.
The items that they'll hang their hat on are that it's buggy to install and you'll get no more guide data or VOD.
Cable companies have sabotaged cablecard because it'll cost them a few dollars per month per subscriber in box rental fees.
In response to your post you seem to have a distorted view on as to why an installer would recommend you not get a cable card. You seem to think they are trained to keep customers from getting them. That is not the case at all in fact.
Fact is they are indeed "buggy" That is the main reason TV manufacturers stopped making cable card TV sets. They have had numerous problems from Firmware issues to Intermittent Issues with loss of channel authorization and problems like those. So yes after seeing numerous problems with them over the years if asked a professional opinion as to what would be better. Most techs would tell you that yes a Converter of some kind would indeed most likely be a better choice. That being said there are plenty of people with cable cards that have never had a problem. However I do think most people have problems with them at some point or another.
It is never an issue of it will make the company "more money" if you get a converter. Majority of techs could care less about that and would not effect their decision on what advice to give you as the subscriber. keep this in mind..if you leave and you have a Converter its not like cause your paying an extra 5 dollars a month that the techs makes an extra 5 dollars a month or anything like that.
Also the fact remains that indeed you do not get the interactive guide and VOD service with the cable card. So yes Those are both very valid reason to go with a Converter.
reply
cybrsk8r6 @ 5th Nov 04:41PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
This might really make me look at ditching CC, getting DSL from Verizon, and my TV over the air.
reply
patryan9 @ 5th Nov 08:29PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by gchris2203 :said by patryan9 :
"Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door"
Conversely, build a crappy mousetrap (1 way cablecard with half-hearted support from the cable co's.) and consumers will ignore you.
Ask a cable installer in your area (as I do every other year or so since 2004 when I got my cablecard TV) about cablecard and he'll dissuade you from trying it.
The items that they'll hang their hat on are that it's buggy to install and you'll get no more guide data or VOD.
Cable companies have sabotaged cablecard because it'll cost them a few dollars per month per subscriber in box rental fees.
In response to your post you seem to have a distorted view on as to why an installer would recommend you not get a cable card. You seem to think they are trained to keep customers from getting them. That is not the case at all in fact.
Sorry... that's not what I intended at all. I'd rely on the opinion of the tech about whether to bother with cablecard and they did not recommend it based upon difficulty of installation, loss of guide data and loss of VOD. I never felt it was a nefarious attempt to get more money out of me on his part.
I'll also share that UPS drivers tend to mention that there's a very high percentage of satellite dishes that get returned via call tag. Another anecdotal example that there may not be sufficient available competition in many markets.
reply
jasg @ 5th Nov 10:54PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by neufuse :
repeats? tru2way is pretty much dead it seems like....
Most of the new gen STBs Comcast is rolling out are tru2way boxes - so it will happen. Could fail in the retail marketplace like Cablecard, but the cable companies will move to tru2way. We should get a good idea on the retail future based on what is introduced at the CES show in January.
reply
bicker @ 6th Nov 08:01AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by patryan9 :said by bicker :said by patryan9 :
Conversely, build a crappy mousetrap (1 way cablecard with half-hearted support from the cable co's.) and consumers will ignore you.
The question in this thread is whether people find having CableCARD-compatible televisions better than having a box. Which is it?
"Better" depends on the application doesn't it? Living room/want DVR >I pick box, bedroom/lcd handing on the wall>cablecard.
And both choices are available.
said by patryan9 :said by patryan9 :said by bicker :
Cable companies have sabotaged cablecard because it'll cost them a few dollars per month per subscriber in box rental fees.
That's a cop-out. I've got a CableCARD-compatible DVR. It works fine. Make up some other excuse.
ok... we know that 1 works and was installed fine. How does that scale over all of the Comcast universe? I think your statistical sample of 1 is too small (but that's just me).
So surf over to tivocommunity.com (for example -- since that's a place where a lot of CableCARD users happen to hang out) and ask people there. Post a message saying, "CableCARD never works" and you'll get piled under with replies saying, "You're an idiot; of course CableCARD works!"
One of the big problems with the Internet is that people only post when they have problems. The vast majority of experiences, which are positive, are not reported, because, "It works," isn't really something that motivates someone to wax on and on self-indulging in self-pity for getting the short-end of some stick.
reply
bicker @ 6th Nov 08:09AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by gchris2203 :
Fact is they are indeed "buggy"
As a blanket statement, as you made it, that's ridiculous. Almost every cable box and DVR put into service in the last few years has a CableCARD inside. We're talking millions of boxes, and the CableCARDs work in them.
The problems with CableCARD are mostly a matter of proper activation: Human error is most often the cause of problems encountered. There are bad CableCARDs, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that most CableCARDs that have gone bad before first deployment were simply mishandled before installation. I've seen techs in my home handle them like they're CDs or DVDs, instead of miniature electronic devices.
The technology is definitely less robust than I would have designed it, but then again one of the reasons my sales people get on my back, sometimes, is because of the cost structure of our product. They would have an easier time selling it if it didn't cost as much (obviously). Robustness costs money. My (business) customers should be willing to pay extra for that extra level of reliability, but mass-market consumers typically are not. Mass-market consumers are almost all maniacally focused on getting the lowest possible price that they can, thereby motivating, very effectively motivating, their suppliers to cut costs even if it adversely affects quality. We customers have dug our own hole, and now we have to live with the consequences, and take responsibility for our own collective tendencies, even if we, individually, don't behave that way.
said by gchris2203 :
That is the main reason TV manufacturers stopped making cable card TV sets.
Because consumers refused to pay the extra money for CableCARD televisions.
said by gchris2203 :
Also the fact remains that indeed you do not get the interactive guide and VOD service with the cable card. So yes Those are both very valid reason to go with a Converter.
Very true.
reply
bicker @ 6th Nov 08:12AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by cybrsk8r6 :
This might really make me look at ditching CC, getting DSL from Verizon, and my TV over the air.
If you can get all the entertainment you want over-the-air, I cannot imagine why you wouldn't do that already.
What makes you think DSL from Verizon is going to be as good as HSI from Comcast? (It isn't.) You're better off just getting HSI from Comcast (and getting your over-the-air channels via Comcast cable television for about $1 per month).
reply
gchris2203 @ 6th Nov 08:40AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
The guy I quoted referred to them as "buggy" so that was why I used the term..if you read further I did explain two of the more common problems with the cable cards.
When they are directly inserted into TV's commonly they will lose channels. The solution is a simple taking the card out and re inserting it but annoying none the less. Their has also been numerous problems with firmware of the years. Cards that just simply stop working or wont activate properly. For instance very recently I was sent to a TC for a cable card not activating. Only Limited basic and Basic HD channels were authorizing. I spent over 2 hours at this house and tried several cards in the TV. All of which were doing the same exact thing. I was getting very frustrated because it appeared to be a simple coding issue...turned out as I was about to leave an email was sent out by a Tech Ops supervisor that Toshiba TVs with cable cards were experiencing problems and wont authorize all channels. Problems like those are what you deal with with cable cards directly connected to TVs.
Yes there are plenty of cable cards in DVRs and Converters. They do indeed work fine in fact almost all cards in Converters of any kind work extremely well. That goes for 3rd party DVRs such as Tivos or Tuners for Computers.
They can have problems with activating but any seasoned Tech knows the process. Its nothing but a thing once you have done it several times. So that generally isnt the issue.
Trust me most of you all make very valid arguments especially from the customers perspective. Im just trying to bring a Techs perspective to the thread ;)
reply
anon @ 6th Nov 10:09AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
I am positive that out of the 200 ish in house techs working out of my office and the 25ish network techs. You well not find one that has never had a problem with a cable card install or trouble call relating to the firmware of the tv or tivo or the card simply not liking that device for some odd reason. There is an unwritten but commonly believed rule that whenever you have a cable card install you bring about 6 cards with you for every 1 cable card slot in a customer device. I can count on one finger the number of installs and trouble calls the first card I tried on any brand of TV worked right away. Most of the times the cards work right away with a TIVO, we do not seem to see many MOXI dvrs out my way.
The technology for whatever reason be it cable company driven or customer device driven is very buggy and again only TIVO seems to get it right. There is a big reason manufacturers do not make TV's for cards, and no longer support the TV's they did make. Now I am no rocket scientist but if only one company seems to get the problem solved correctly then that is the company I would buy my cable card device from, if I did not want to pay cable box rental fees or whatever.
reply
bicker @ 6th Nov 09:56AM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by gchris2203 :
When they are directly inserted into TV's commonly they will lose channels.
Just a note: This has never happened to me (in my DVR). I suspect a lot of this has to do with the robustness of the host device's implementation of the interface. Of course, older devices, such as the CableCARD televisions that were sold in 2005 and 2006, were not designed with as much robustness as more recently designed devices, and were not designed to take advantage of software-driven updates.
reply
Curlee @ 6th Nov 12:47PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Do you have a TIVO at the office, so you can do CableCARD pre-screens before you hit the field?
reply
riblet @ 6th Nov 01:29PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by bicker :
As per federal regulations, digital "cable-ready" is provided for. However, consumers have been generally unwilling to do their part, refusing (when originally offered in 2005) to spend the extra money for the compatible equipment.
I bought a 42" HDTV (and a TiVo) with CableCARD slots in 2006 and Comcast refused to provide them to me. The cable industry has done everything it can to suppress this technology.
reply
Curlee @ 6th Nov 01:40PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by bicker :
There are bad CableCARDs, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that most CableCARDs that have gone bad before first deployment were simply mishandled before installation.
In my experience, the number one killer of electronics is electrostatic discharge. PCMCIA cards appear to be physically well protected against ESD. If this were not the case, you'd expect to see more failures in low humidity seasons or parts of the country.
said by bicker :
We customers have dug our own hole, and now we have to live with the consequences, and take responsibility for our own collective tendencies, even if we, individually, don't behave that way.
By analogy then, I'm collectively partially responsible for what passes as contemporary music today? (laugh)
reply
Curlee @ 6th Nov 01:48PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by gchris2203 :
When they are directly inserted into TV's commonly they will lose channels.
By "directly inserted", do you mean hot-plugged?
This is designed not to do any electrical damage. But it's difficult, if not impossible, to test firmware for every timing possibility. You might have better luck powering down the TV first.
reply
Curlee @ 6th Nov 02:23PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by bicker :
Robustness costs money. My (business) customers should be willing to pay extra for that extra level of reliability, but mass-market consumers typically are not. Mass-market consumers are almost all maniacally focused on getting the lowest possible price that they can ...
I see this rush for cheapness in the hiring of engineers, to which I standardly reply:
"If you had to have brain surgery, would you hire 20 cheap doctors with one year experience, or one expensive doctor with 20 years experience?"
Nowhere is this effect more immediate than in English soccer. An expensive, talented striker is traded, and the team plummets in the standings.
reply
bicker @ 6th Nov 03:22PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
What I wrote is absolutely the facts.
said by riblet :
I bought a 42" HDTV (and a TiVo) with CableCARD slots in 2006 and Comcast refused to provide them to me.
I don't believe you. I have been following the CableCARD issue very closely since the TiVo S3 came out, and Comcast never refused to provide them in the categorical manner your comment implies. I believe you're omitting key facts that would tend to decimate the argument you're trying to make.
reply
bicker @ 6th Nov 03:24PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by Curlee :
By analogy then, I'm collectively partially responsible for what passes as contemporary music today? (laugh)
Hehe... indeed. We let it happen. However, beyond that, the point is not to take individual responsibility, but rather to place responsibility where it belongs, i.e., on all of us collectively. That's why I underlined what I underlined in the message you replied to.
reply
riblet @ 6th Nov 03:33PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by bicker :
I don't believe you. I have been following the CableCARD issue very closely since the TiVo S3 came out, and Comcast never refused to provide them in the categorical manner your comment implies. I believe you're omitting key facts that would tend to decimate the argument you're trying to make.
Good thing the truth is not contingent on what you believe, because in February, April, August and December 2006 and March and July 2007 I tried to get Cable CARDS for both the TV and TiVo and Comcast refused to provide them saying that the were not available. Maybe you should listen to what people's first-hand experience is telling you.
I eventually solved the problem by kicking Comcast to the curb. If I am going to need a set-top box it'll be for a superior product, which is satellite TV.
reply
caddyroger @ 6th Nov 03:51PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
That might been your Comcast office. I bought my TiVo s3 the same month that they came out. I drove to my Comcast office and picked up 3 cable cards 2 for the TiVo S3 and 1 for my tv. Less then 1 hour after I got home my TiVo and tv was working with the cable cards. To say Comcast does not provide Cable cards is wrong. It was just your office that said that. If you contacted the corporate office they may have got the cards for you
--
Caddy
reply
The Q @ 6th Nov 04:35PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Somebody has a few cablecards, roughly half a million deployed in stand-alone retail devices:
»www.lightreading.com/document.as···d=178653
According to the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) data filed in late June 2009, the top 10 "incumbent" U.S. cable MSOs had deployed more than 14.08 million operator-supplied set-tops with CableCARDs since the FCC ban took effect two years ago. By comparison, those same MSOs have deployed just over 437,800 CableCARD modules for use in retail devices.
reply
bicker @ 6th Nov 04:40PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by riblet :
Maybe you should listen to what people's first-hand experience is telling you.
I listened, and I don't believe you. I think you are making things up, and/or hiding relevant facts. I say this because I was very much attuned to the issue at the time, and I would have heard if the company was overtly violating the law as you assert. Indeed, if you were telling the truth, then you would likely have pursued the issue with your Members of Congress, and gotten action to resolve your concerns, since provision of CableCARDs was indeed the law. Again, I think you're making things up, and/or hiding relevant facts.
reply
bicker @ 6th Nov 04:43PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by caddyroger :
That might been your Comcast office. I bought my TiVo s3 the same month that they came out. I drove to my Comcast office and picked up 3 cable cards 2 for the TiVo S3 and 1 for my tv. Less then 1 hour after I got home my TiVo and tv was working with the cable cards. To say Comcast does not provide Cable cards is wrong. It was just your office that said that. If you contacted the corporate office they may have got the cards for you
Yes, I do suspect that that's the sort of deception that the previous poster was engaging in, perhaps going to the local office and insisting on being given CableCARDs instead of ordering them through the published mechanisms and having them installed by technicians like the rest of us. I suspect part of the what the previous poster left out was his assumption that he's better than everyone else and therefore deserved to be treated in a manner different from the rest of us, and that he felt there should have been different procedures to satisfy his needs than that provided to serve the needs of all of us.
This is my biggest concern about online forums -- the fact that people can complain without there being a legitimate and fair opportunity for those being complained against to tell their side of the story -- without there being any chance of us readers getting the whole truth.
reply
riblet @ 6th Nov 07:30PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
said by bicker :
I listened, and I don't believe you. I think you are making things up, and/or hiding relevant facts. I say this because I was very much attuned to the issue at the time, and I would have heard if the company was overtly violating the law as you assert. Indeed, if you were telling the truth, then you would likely have pursued the issue with your Members of Congress, and gotten action to resolve your concerns, since provision of CableCARDs was indeed the law. Again, I think you're making things up, and/or hiding relevant facts.
.
Read: THEY WOULD NOT PROVIDE THEM. The law did not matter. Yeah I could have sued but that would kind of defeat the purpose, eh?
No congress person is going to force Comcast to do anything. I gave them the opportunity to make it right and when they didn't I took my business elsewhere. I voted with my money. What about that is so hard for you to understand?
reply
anon @ 6th Nov 08:39PM:
msg deleted
deleted by a moderator
reply
caddyroger @ 6th Nov 09:38PM:
Re: Is my "free" cable box really free?
Got news for you. You did not hurt Comcast. You think losing 1 sub going to hurt. Now if you let the corp office know what that local office was doing you might have got some thing done about. Did you ask them to install the cards or did you insist that they give you the cards?
--
Caddy
reply
Thank you for using lo-fi dslreports.com - report bugs
© 99-2009 silver matrix LLC