said by phattieg :said by antiphishing :
You'd think they would make a logon/off script that ftp'd the number of processes running, and the names, for each machine at the end of the day. They should ALL be running the same identical image, so if anything odd occured, they'd know right away...
You know that would be way to easy and still most people would just ignore any warning no matter how serious they where.
Holy sh@@ my warning icon (above) just went off, better go check my Windows processes. :D
--
Specializing in "takes downs" of phishing and advance fee scams
Send your Phishing/Advance fee scams to: phish@antihotmail.com
»/profile/1021645
reply
Oleg @ 30th Mar 02:07PM:Re: I can attest to that!said by fatmanskinny :
I worked in a huge company where machines were compromised at least once a month.
I think giving all end users admin rights on their machines is not a good idea. My new company does not allow admin rights for end users. It creates additional work for IS but the payoff is that you assist the end user in not being a danger to themselves or anyone else.
What about crackers?
It takes me less than 5min. to get Admin rights on any Windows based PC.
reply
openbox9 @ 30th Mar 03:49PM:Re: I can attest to that!I made the comment below that until corporations experience financial implications, network/computer security simply aren't a concern. HIPAA provides that financial implication and therefor you will have positive response from the top.
reply
sporkme @ 30th Mar 05:31PM:Thank MS and the MCSE culture...There are so many bad admins because they are focused on
Windows technologies rather than general networking and internetworking knowledge.
For example, anyone with a smidgen of common sense and a basic understanding of network security would not have PCs in a "Fortune 1000" company setup in such a way that they can connect outbound to port 25. The network design should not make that a requirement (connecting to arbitrary outside hosts). There are plenty of simple, logical ways to protect the internet from windows boxes...
reply
toadlife @ 30th Mar 05:36PM:Re: I can attest to that!With physical access, right?
reply
toadlife @ 30th Mar 06:13PM:DeepFreeze == badThe big problem with DeepFreeze is the people use it as an excuse not to bother even try to secure the computer, and never update their master images with the latest security updates.
The result is that master images get stale and vulnerabilities add up and the systems are perpetually infected with network worms. Even if you shut them all down to be refreshed, there are usually one or two machines somewhere on the network that are infected and still up, which make refreshing a PC is futile.
I've seen the scenario I've described above play out myself at schools I've virited and heard of it from a security consultant who had visited other schools that use DeepFreeze.
If your school is using deepfreeze along with limited user accounts, I say they are wasting money on a grand scale. Limited accounts along with deploying security updates in a timely manner is just as, or more effective than band-aide, bad-habit-inducing programs like DeepFreeze.
--
Hate your enemies. Save your friends. Find your place. Speak the truth.reply
Oleg @ 30th Mar 07:07PM:Re: I can attest to that!said by toadlife :
With physical access, right?
Yes.
reply
quetwo @ 30th Mar 09:55PM:Re: DeepFreeze == badAt our University, we use Rembo, which allows our "IT" staff to slipstream images into the PCs on next boot. Works like a charm, and they get updated once a month at the very worst.
Oh, and we don't have firewalls, IPSs, etc. Every PC on campus has a 35.0.0.0/8 address.
reply
joebarnhart @ 31st Mar 03:17AM:Re: Thank MS and the MCSE culture...Exactly! I was going to ask about this. It seems like the logical solution is to block the SMTP port (25) so 'bots can't send email. There's no good reason for the PC to be sending mail directly (i.e. not through the company's mail system). I even set up my home network this way. Plus, looking at the firewall logs to see who's trying to access port 25 alerts you to compromised machines.
reply
woody7 @ 2nd Apr 10:45AM:Re: DeepFreeze == badI can understand software developers not liking this, at home I use "true Image" and that isn't a problem. You need some kind of solution for various users, or you would be spending all your time / resources cleaning them up. School has a lot of intelligent people, but you wouldn't know it by the way they act. When something goes horribly wrong, they expect you to drop what you are doing and fix it. They don't even want to spend $10 dollars on a flash/pen drive to back up their data.. and then can't understand why it is lost...and 9 out of 10 times it is something they have done...Ours is "deepfreeze" enterprise, they are on a domain, with group policy in place, thawed space to save to, and yes it is a pain to install programs for them , but only with the districts approved apps (licensing wise, can't install same program on 10 computers unless you have the license..etc. I'm not an enforcer, but I just say then let the district do it...seems to work everytime. This seems to work, and not a lot of complaints.Is this for everyone, no,but for schools and librarys, internet cafe's etc, it is a good solution.JMT
--
BlooMereply
Thank you for using lo-fi dslreports.com - report bugs
© 99-2009 silver matrix LLC