Phorm Fighting Tightening Balance Sheet AND Critics - Controversial company has no actual income outside of interest...
Links: home · search · speed test · login · more ·

Phorm Fighting Tightening Balance Sheet AND Critics
Controversial company has no actual income outside of interest...
10:47AM Thursday Jun 18 2009 by Karl Bode
tags: legal · business · privacy · world · consumers
Controversial adversnooping company Phorm used to be named 121Media and has a history with rootkits and spyware. So it wasn't particularly surprising when privacy advocates began opposing the the company's efforts to push behavioral advertising systems in the UK that were dressed up as anti-phishing solutions. Criticism heated up further when the company conducted several rounds of secret trials of the technology with British incumbent British Telecom -- without informing consumers their browsing was being closely tracked.

As with the now defunct NebuAD here in the States, Phorm has had a hell of a few years. You could tell that Phorm was starting to struggle when the company recently went off the deep end and began complaining about "smear campaigns" against the questionable company, but their balance sheet isn't any healthier. According to Reuters, the company lost $48 million over the last year. The Guardian looks at where the money's going:
The PDF tells us - $7.1m went on research and development, but the biggest cost category was $42m in 'sales and administrative expenses', including $26.6m in staff costs - salaries grew to $15.7m and severance compensation was $3.6m, mostly after scrapping the US-centric directors board. The company raised $65m through share placements in March 2008 and finished 2008 with $23.2m cash in the bank. But that evaporated to just $12.8m by this May 31, so it had to raise another $24.2m earlier this month.
At the moment, the company's got no income other than interest, but says they still have the resources to proceed. However, the huge amount of cash Phorm's burning through may put a damper on their proposed expansion from the UK to the US, which surely upsets privacy advocates. Still, Phorm says they have current "engagement with ISPs in 15 markets, including eight of the top 10 globally." The company is rumored to have at least discussed partnerships with both AT&T and Qwest.

Related:
  1. Thursday Evening Links
  2. Friday Evening Links
  3. Monday Evening Links
  4. Wednesday Evening Links
  5. Friday Evening Links
  6. British Telecom To Expand Phorm Use
  7. Wednesday Evening Links
  8. NSA Still 'Overcollecting' American Data
Links: New Topic
Forums »

old_wiz_60 @ 18th Jun 11:44AM:
Let them drop.

A leopard does not change spots. Once a spyware company, always a spyware company. Why would anyone trust them after the rootkits?
reply
TamaraB @ 18th Jun 11:47AM:
Scary

It's scary knowing that a company which has absolutely no income, can raise the scores of millions of dollars which it has. It's scary because there are millions out there ready to invest big bucks to track our movements. The advertising industry is the long-term threat to security and privacy here.
--
"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." -- Voltaire

reply
anon @ 18th Jun 12:05PM:
Wrong Nationality!

Why is this US site referring to Phorm as a British company? :(

Company reg No:4308840
Delaware, United States of America
reply
major marco @ 18th Jun 12:08PM:
Re: Let them drop.

said by old_wiz_60 :

A leopard does not change spots. Once a spyware company, always a spyware company. Why would anyone trust them after the rootkits?
That's what was said about ChoicePoint and Doubleclick, both of which today are doing very well. The public forgot all about the privacy debacles both were part & parcel of as recently as 2005.
reply
Pv8man @ 18th Jun 12:18PM:
Die Phorm..

Die Phorm...just die

Just one of the companies that NEEDS to fail.

Unless they are given a bailout of course
reply
Ignite @ 18th Jun 04:47PM:
Re: Wrong Nationality!

said by J D :

Why is this US site referring to Phorm as a British company? :(

Company reg No:4308840
Delaware, United States of America
That's just where the company is registered. Virgin Media is a Delaware company too.
reply
SLD @ 18th Jun 05:30PM:
Re: Scary

You've made a perfect argument against corporations donating to politicians. These entities can ramp up enormous resources quickly that voters cannot.
reply
anon @ 18th Jun 07:35PM:
Re: Wrong Nationality!

said by Ignite :

said by J D :

Why is this US site referring to Phorm as a British company? :(

Company reg No:4308840
Delaware, United States of America
That's just where the company is registered. Virgin Media is a Delaware company too.
indeed it is, and the majority shares are also owned by US corporations, what was your point again ;)

that the majority of VMs actual profits go to US corporations, both in shares, and mass contracts to US cable kit hardware and middleware providers
reply
megarock @ 19th Jun 12:16AM:
Hmmm..

Maybe they could bring in the soon to be ex-CEO of SCO.
reply

Thank you for using lo-fi dslreports.com - report bugs
© 99-2009 silver matrix LLC