U.S. Broadband Still Relatively Slow - Speed Matters released third annual speed report...
Links: home · search · speed test · login · more ·

U.S. Broadband Still Relatively Slow
Speed Matters released third annual speed report...
12:01PM Tuesday Aug 25 2009 by Karl Bode
tags: competition · business · bandwidth · scam · consumers
A telecom labor union-backed group dubbed Speed Matters has released their third annual report on the state of the broadband union. The group, with an obvious interest in increased broadband deployment, has long lamented the fact that the US is only industrialized country without a national policy to promote universal, affordable high speed Internet access. Well, at least for another 176 days, at which point the FCC will unveil our new broadband plan.

The group has logged 413,000 broadband speed tests via their website, and says we're still significantly behind other developed nations. 18% of testers have connections slower than 768 kbps, while 51% of testers have connections between 768 kbps and 6 Mbps. 17% of testers have speeds between 10 Mbps and 25 Mbps, while just 2% of users posted speeds faster than 25 Mbps.

Click for full size
"Between 2007 and 2009, the average download speed in the United States has increased by only 1.6 megabits per second (mbps), from 3.5 mbps in 2007 to 5.1 mbps in 2009," proclaims the report. "At this rate, it will take the United States 15 years to catch up with current Internet speeds in South Korea, the country with the fastest average Internet connections."

Speed Matters also released a complete breakdown of each state and territory's average broadband speed. Montana (2,322 kbps), Puerto Rico (1,043 kbps), Hawaii (2,968 kbps) and Wyoming (2,598) bring up the rear, while Delaware (9,906 kbps), Rhode Island (9,788 kbps), Massachusetts (8,645 kbps) and New Jersey (8,863 kbps) clock in as the fastest states. Recent reports by Akamai confirm Delaware is the fastest state in the union, and that the United States has the 33rd fastest average broadband connections in the world.

"The average download speed of U.S. Internet connections is 5.1 megabits per second, significantly below the averages of countries like South Korea (20.1 mbps), Japan (16 mbps) and Sweden (12.7 mbps)," Speed Matters' Alex Kellner tells Broadband Reports. "Only twenty percent of those who took the Speed Matters speed test have Internet speeds in the range of the top ranked countries," notes Kellner, adding that "18 percent of test takers didn’t meet the FCC definition for current-generation broadband."

Related:
  1. Wednesday Evening Links
  2. Comcast DOCSIS 3.0 Hits Denver
  3. What Network Neutrality Is REALLY About
  4. FCC To Investigate Special Access Pricing
  5. AT&T: Google Is The Enemy Of Nuns
  6. FCC Study: Open Access Lowers Prices, Improves Competition
  7. TDS Telecom Launches 50 Mbps Fiber
  8. Wall Street Journal Tries, Fails To Cover Metered Billing Debate
Links: New Topic
Forums »

PoCkEt @ 25th Aug 11:36AM:
Comparison...

It's kind of cool to see how much more the East coast is covered with broadband access then the west coast.
reply
baineschile @ 25th Aug 11:40AM:
Basic geography

The US has a lot of people spread over a wide area. Countries that are high and fast in BB pentration are generally smaller, and have a higher concentration of people (Japan, S Korea, most parts of Europe).

Also, a side note. That map color kinda makes New Jersey look like a pimple on the United States
reply
BosstonesOwn @ 25th Aug 11:42AM:
Re: Basic geography

Don't make excuses , if that was the case all metro areas with high density would be served by gig e fiber.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"

reply
TKJunkMail @ 25th Aug 11:52AM:
Did Speed Matters take wireless in to account with their #'s

I didn't find it on their site, but it might be there somewhere, but did Speed Matters take measurement skewing in to account with people using smartphones(the ones that support flash?) both thru WiFi and thru 2G & 3G wireless networks? If they didn't, that would be a problem with their statistics.

Also more relevant, they used speedtest.net for all measurements outside the US, but DIDN'T use the same more extensive database from speedtest.net for their US comparisons. Why is that? Because speedtest.net has a much bigger sampling and shows higher numbers than from their own site?
[att=1]
Speed matters says US down/up is 5.1/1.1 mbps
Speedtest.net says US down/up is 6.79/1.51 mbps
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

Click for full size
reply
BF69 @ 25th Aug 11:52AM:
Kind of dubious

I saw for my zip code it said 768 kbps-6 Mbps and I know Charter offers 20 Mbps. Clicked my area and only 4 tests were done. How in the hell are you going to base anything on 4 tests. It says 2326 kbps for the speed in my area. Which is of course totally off. I can guarantee the vast majority of people in my area that have internet have speds faster than 2326 kbps
reply
JSRoman @ 25th Aug 11:54AM:
Last I checked Puerto Rico was not a state.

Someone please tell these folks. Shit load of unions on the island though.

They threw in DC also. Nice.
--
»www.seabee.navy.mil

reply
BF69 @ 25th Aug 11:56AM:
Re: Last I checked Puerto Rico was not a state.

Give it time PR wil be
reply
mrkevin @ 25th Aug 12:01PM:
I'm happy

I see my state ranks 42...Way to go. I see at least we are consistant.

The map is wrong also.
We offer more than 768k, and our area is colored white.
--
An army of sheep led by a lion, will always defeat an army of lions led by a sheep.

reply
mrkevin @ 25th Aug 12:02PM:
Re: Last I checked Puerto Rico was not a state.

They also included the US Virgin Islands.
reply
BloodRoses @ 25th Aug 12:06PM:
Re: Basic geography

So compare it to the average speeds of the entire continent of Europe. We'd still be very far behind.
--
Faerie Blessings,
Stephanie - www.GlitterFaerie.net

reply
BF69 @ 25th Aug 12:07PM:
Re: Last I checked Puerto Rico was not a state.

said by mrkevin :

They also included the US Virgin Islands.
damn them virgins! how dare they think of themselves as americans!
reply
anon @ 25th Aug 12:11PM:
Population Density

Why is that cool? Its basic population density. There are more people per square mile in the east than in the west. It costs a heck of a lot more money to deploy service when your customers live miles and miles apart!
reply
Transmaster @ 25th Aug 12:37PM:
Big suprise

Wyoming is 47th. Well if I lived in Woods Landing, Wyoming I could care less about the internet anyway. Being able to walk into my back yard and fly fish for dinner would make twitter, and face book a total waste of time.
--
I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's.
- Mark Twain in Eruption

reply
baineschile @ 25th Aug 12:37PM:
Re: Basic geography

Actually, I would love that stat. I wonder how the average of Poland, Austria, Bosnia, etc would factor in....
reply
Kearnstd @ 25th Aug 12:54PM:
Re: Basic geography

it is also money, lots of these super fast countries the networks are being built by state owned or state funded telecoms and not stock held corporations.

could our corporations run fiber to every home, sure but the stock holders would fire the board.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

reply
jimbo2150 @ 25th Aug 01:05PM:
Re: Did Speed Matters take wireless in to account with their #'s

said by TKJunkMail :

Also more relevant, they used speedtest.net for all measurements outside the US, but DIDN'T use the same more extensive database from speedtest.net for their US comparisons. Why is that? Because speedtest.net has a much bigger sampling and shows higher numbers than from their own site?
Welcome to the world of fudged statistics!
Oh, btw, I don't think that in this case 1.69 difference is going to make all THAT much of a difference... considering the US is still WAY off the bottom of that list as well (notice it goes 12, 13, 14, ~~, 27/28).
--

- "Techie" Jim

reply
BF69 @ 25th Aug 01:13PM:
Re: Basic geography

said by baineschile :

The US has a lot of people spread over a wide area. Countries that are high and fast in BB pentration are generally smaller, and have a higher concentration of people (Japan, S Korea, most parts of Europe).
That's a bullshit excuse. then how come RI doen't have symetrical 100 Mbps conenctions? Very small and TWICE the population density of Japan
reply
N3OGH @ 25th Aug 01:15PM:
Re: Basic geography

said by baineschile :

Also, a side note. That map color kinda makes New Jersey look like a pimple on the United States
More like a wart on the ass of progress.

Or a festering sore of corruption. Where else can you find rabbis trafficking in kidneys?
--
Petty people are disproportionably corrupted by petty power…

reply
Mac Bridger @ 25th Aug 01:25PM:
Zip Code

Something to note, their map goes by zip code. In some states, WV for instance, a zip code can cover a huge area. That doesn't mean that the whole area is covered by broadband. I noticed several areas that they had only 1 test for. (Including my own under/unserved zip)
--
Fight Cancer! Join DSLR's Team Discovery

reply
Duramax08 @ 25th Aug 01:33PM:
Re: Zip Code

I hate when they go by the zip code because time warner cable said there is cable in my zip code. Guess if one person in the zipcode has some highspeed internet, everyone else has the availability to get high speed internet. So much bullshit going on these days.
--
One day, High speed internet will be down my road! Willing to put DSLAM's or cable plants on my yard. Contact me AT&T or TWC to set up an appointment =]

reply
jmn1207 @ 25th Aug 01:49PM:
Looking Good

A 1.6 Mbps increase over a couple of years is nearly a 50% improvement. If we continue at this pace we will be on track much sooner than what is being reported. I don't anticipate us making only 1.6 Mbps increases every 2-3 years, but rather a 50% increase in current average speeds. It shouldn't take us 15 years to catch up.
reply
Pashune @ 25th Aug 02:05PM:
Re: Looking Good

said by jmn1207 :

A 1.6 Mbps increase over a couple of years is nearly a 50% improvement. If we continue at this pace we will be on track much sooner than what is being reported. I don't anticipate us making only 1.6 Mbps increases every 2-3 years, but rather a 50% increase in current average speeds. It shouldn't take us 15 years to catch up.
I guess I can somewhat agree with this. My ISP ramped up their 3 meg internet package to 5 mbit while also increasing the prices for new consumers... :(

Eh, I guess new speeds have to be paid for somewhere?
--
ISP: CableOne 5 mbit/500 kbit

reply
dlewis23 @ 25th Aug 02:15PM:
Inaccurate Speed test

You know when the speed test they use is inaccurate, this does no good.

I have a 12 Mbps connection, Normally get about 11.6 Mbps, with there speedtest I was just above 8 Mbps.

So what good does it do when the tool they use to figure out these results is inaccurate.
reply
Omega @ 25th Aug 02:19PM:
Re: Big suprise

I have faster internet in Wyoming (8 mbit) than I ever did in California and Ohio. Next year, I'm going to upgrade to 16mbps. Compare that to 3mbit in Ohio (Cleveland) and 6 in CA (Santa Maria)
--
Whats smells like blue?

reply
jmn1207 @ 25th Aug 02:19PM:
Re: Looking Good

We still have a long way to go, and we are certainly not leading the way, or anywhere close to it. The parameters used to measure broadband performance are largely subjective, so it's difficult to make any accurate comparisons. (even that statement was subjective)
reply
Eat Me @ 25th Aug 02:40PM:
Re: Comparison...

said by PoCkEt :

It's kind of cool to see how much more the East coast is covered with broadband access then the west coast.
There's a reason for that. Apart from California a lot of the West is not as populated as the East.
reply
baineschile @ 25th Aug 02:54PM:
Re: Basic geography

Because there isnt 1 provider that serves RI that doesnt service a larger state where the infastructure is already in place.

Also, lets not forget basic business here. Supply and demand. Right now, there is very little demand for a 100/sym interner (BBR users aside), therefore, there is no supply.
reply
baineschile @ 25th Aug 02:54PM:
Re: Basic geography

LOL @ NJ
reply
pandora @ 25th Aug 02:55PM:
Re: Comparison...

It's all about population density. A lot of the U.S. is very sparsely populated, and it will never be economically viable to build physical infrastructure to provide broadband. Wireless may be an option.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."

reply
BF69 @ 25th Aug 02:57PM:
Re: Inaccurate Speed test

said by dlewis23 :

You know when the speed test they use is inaccurate, this does no good.

I have a 12 Mbps connection, Normally get about 11.6 Mbps, with there speedtest I was just above 8 Mbps.

So what good does it do when the tool they use to figure out these results is inaccurate.
I found thier test to be accurate as other.

Just test speakeasy 13.4 Mbps, chater speedtest 14.4, theirs 13.7 Mbps
reply
Transmaster @ 25th Aug 02:59PM:
Re: Big suprise

said by Omega :

I have faster internet in Wyoming (8 mbit) than I ever did in California and Ohio. Next year, I'm going to upgrade to 16mbps. Compare that to 3mbit in Ohio (Cleveland) and 6 in CA (Santa Maria)
Indeed I have 7 meg's from Qwest, what we have fairly good. :)
--
I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's.
- Mark Twain in Eruption

reply
antdude @ 25th Aug 03:00PM:
Cool reports.

»www.speedmatters.org/content/2009report is cool. I can't find one for 2008 and 2007 by replacing their year's last digit. Does anyone know where it is? Thank you in advance. :)
reply
Gbcue @ 25th Aug 04:00PM:
Re: Basic geography

said by Kearnstd :

could our corporations run fiber to every home, sure but the stock holders would fire the board.
They can, and do (Verizon FiOS). Now, after spending $25 billion, they're making money hand over fist.
--
My BLOG!
Black Friday Ads

reply
Madness @ 25th Aug 03:50PM:
Side Note

I'm more-than-curious about why one would need such uber-fast BB connections in the first place. One certainly doesn't need it for basic web surfing & email! The only things I can think of are P2P & a "family" home network.
--
No keyboard present or keyboard error. Press <F1> to continue....

reply
Gbcue @ 25th Aug 04:04PM:
Re: Looking Good

said by jmn1207 :

A 1.6 Mbps increase over a couple of years is nearly a 50% improvement. If we continue at this pace we will be on track much sooner than what is being reported. I don't anticipate us making only 1.6 Mbps increases every 2-3 years, but rather a 50% increase in current average speeds. It shouldn't take us 15 years to catch up.
So while the US is gaining in the single megabit speeds, other countries are going to hundreds of megabits and gigabit speeds leaving us further behind.
--
My BLOG!
Black Friday Ads

reply
jmn1207 @ 25th Aug 04:12PM:
Re: Looking Good

said by Gbcue :

said by jmn1207 :

A 1.6 Mbps increase over a couple of years is nearly a 50% improvement. If we continue at this pace we will be on track much sooner than what is being reported. I don't anticipate us making only 1.6 Mbps increases every 2-3 years, but rather a 50% increase in current average speeds. It shouldn't take us 15 years to catch up.
So while the US is gaining in the single megabit speeds, other countries are going to hundreds of megabits and gigabit speeds leaving us further behind.
I really can't say. 20 Mbps was leading the way this year with average broadband download speeds, what was this back in 2007? If it was anything more than 10Mbps, we would appear to be making gains, statistically speaking. 50% is a significant increase, and if it can be maintained, we should be right near the top before too long.

Personally, I don't really expect us to catch up anytime soon, but I don't expect us to fall hopelessly behind any more than we already appear to be.
reply
anon @ 25th Aug 04:28PM:
Affordable

I think the whole point of the report is " AFFORDABLE SPEED". Its what people have, not what's available, lowest price DSL and low price cable HSI at 1.5 and 8mbps will at a 50-50 split give you a 5mbps avg. YES you can get faster speeds but not at a price that people are "gonna" pay, just to check E-MAIL. Telecom labor union-backed group = lots of discount dsl users to participate in the group.
reply
sonicmerlin @ 25th Aug 04:28PM:
Re: Basic geography

said by Kearnstd :

it is also money, lots of these super fast countries the networks are being built by state owned or state funded telecoms and not stock held corporations.

could our corporations run fiber to every home, sure but the stock holders would fire the board.
No they're not. Japan didn't subsidize fiber build-out. They used very strict regulations to encourage FTTH. That's why their most remote rural areas still don't have fiber.

Sweden is the same. Only South Korea's government really seems focused on subsidizing fiber build-outs.

And considering the telecoms received $200 billion here in the US to build out fiber (and instead used that money to build their wireless networks, which have been a giant cashcow for them over the last 10 years), I don't see how the industry could be any more "subsidized" over here.
reply
sonicmerlin @ 25th Aug 04:31PM:
Re: Basic geography

That's really not true. The recent recession has demonstrated the increasing inelasticity of broadband. The fact that lower-speed DSL providers continue to hemorrhage customers to higher-speed cable, forcing AT&T and Verizon to upgrade their networks, is ample evidence of demand.

Verizon's Fios service thus far has been quite successful. Rural carriers who have been stringing out fiber over the last decade have also been successful. This proves there is in fact demand for FTTH.

Not to mention the issue is often times a chicken and egg scenario. Until the connections are available and a few early adopters use them and tell all their friends how great it is, the demand will not reach its true potential.
reply
trackdrew @ 25th Aug 04:32PM:
Re: I'm happy

Its an average, it goes the other way too. I'm on a dial-up connection that maxes out at around 42k, and that's the fastest service available to me, but for some reason my area is colored orange.

Just because my neighbors down the street have access to both Fios and Comcast, doesn't mean that those providers cover the whole area.
reply
toddbs98 @ 25th Aug 04:43PM:
Re: Side Note

A universal broadband plan giving every American access to the Internet would be socialism and something only Hitler and other Nazi's would endorse just like Universal health care. These people should be proud Americans a be glad to get whatever corporate America decides they need at the highest possible price.
--
Patriots always speak of dying for their country never killing for it. Bertrand Russell

reply
cameronsfx @ 25th Aug 04:44PM:
Re: Comparison...

Does BBR ever have any real news? :uhh:
reply
Skippy25 @ 25th Aug 04:58PM:
Re: Comparison...

said by pandora :

It's all about population density. A lot of the U.S. is very sparsely populated, and it will never be economically viable to build physical infrastructure to provide broadband. Wireless may be an option.
And it is the shear stupidity of these statements that has us where we are.

I guess the same could of been said of phone, electric, gas, highways, and educational systems. Glad the government stepped in to force those on us. It is about time they do the same here.
reply
iansltx @ 25th Aug 05:32PM:
Re: Comparison...

There was a controversy about SpeedMatters awhile back. Something about their networks being low-bandwidth. They may have fixed that now, but unless they have multiple geographically diverse speedtest sites you're not getting an accurate description of speeds.

Also, by the end of the year the nation's largest cable company will have most of their customers above the 10 Mbps mark, shifting the national average northward by a megabit or two.
reply
iansltx @ 25th Aug 05:36PM:
Re: Basic geography

Correction: it's not about supply and demand, it's about competition.

In areas where there's 50 Mbps fiber, cable companies have been quick to roll otu 50 Mbps DOCSIS 3. I'll bet Comcast will have 100 Mbps by the end of next yesr, maybe even symmetric thanks to channel bonding on the upstream side of the pipe. However that will probably only be in a select few areas, where FiOS is, at least for awhile.
reply
iansltx @ 25th Aug 05:42PM:
Re: Population Density

Or less. Wireless gear is pretty cheap these days ($150 for a radio + antenna etc.) however it requires relatively clean spectrum. Which is available in rural areas where you don't have the nation's largest WiFi network at your disposal (linksys).
reply
iansltx @ 25th Aug 05:43PM:
Re: Big suprise

Heh, I'm a bit more picky. 10/5 Mbps PowelLink, please.
reply
iansltx @ 25th Aug 05:44PM:
Re: Zip Code

How's the wireless project coming? How many folks in your area would be willing to get service if it was available? You might be able to do 20 Mbps symmetric over wireless with some of this new hot-shot tech :D
reply
pandora @ 25th Aug 06:08PM:
Re: Comparison...

said by Skippy25 :

And it is the shear stupidity of these statements that has us where we are.

I guess the same could of been said of phone, electric, gas, highways, and educational systems. Glad the government stepped in to force those on us. It is about time they do the same here.
There are jerks who unfortunately cast out insults and are unable to debate. Last time I was in Nebraska I passed a sign saying 157 miles to the next service station. Perhaps one day you may become acquainted with the United States.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."

reply
Duramax08 @ 25th Aug 06:55PM:
Re: Zip Code

Lol what wireless project. Really dont talk to the people down the street other then 1 family but thats it. Even they are waiting for roadrunner or dsl.
--
One day, High speed internet will be down my road! Willing to put DSLAM's or cable plants on my yard. Contact me AT&T or TWC to set up an appointment =]

reply
iansltx @ 25th Aug 07:18PM:
Re: Zip Code

If there are enough potential subscribers in your area (probably not; the number would be around 70) you could grab a 100 Mbit connection from Cogent, set up your wireless gear and have wireless internet that's as fast as cable...
reply
Duramax08 @ 25th Aug 09:01PM:
Re: Zip Code

I would of gone with wireless but since I got no line of sight, it would be way to much work and I really dont know much about wireless so Id rather wait for that broadband stimulus plan if that does anything at all for me. Started poking AT&T with a stick using the BBB. That seemed like it failed horribly so now time to use a bigger stick, The FCC. Im not gona give up without a fight after what they done to me.
--
One day, High speed internet will be down my road! Willing to put DSLAM's or cable plants on my yard. Contact me AT&T or TWC to set up an appointment =]

reply
sonicmerlin @ 25th Aug 09:45PM:
Re: Comparison...

It won't be economically viable in the short-term no. But a recent report by the USDA has demonstrated the significant long-term positive economic effects of broadband on rural areas.

Not to mention over the long-term, even with a somewhat lower uptake rate on the fiber, the initial capital investment will be paid off.
reply
pandora @ 25th Aug 09:48PM:
Re: Comparison...

Maybe broadband via wireless for some hard to serve rural areas would suffice. In the U.S. we have many areas with low population density, and it makes providing service expensive. Rural charm may involve being remote from not only people, but various types of services.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."

reply
sonicmerlin @ 25th Aug 09:49PM:
Re: I'm happy

said by mrkevin :

I see my state ranks 42...Way to go. I see at least we are consistant.

The map is wrong also.
We offer more than 768k, and our area is colored white.
Strange how almost everything you and a few other users say is met with logic and rational thought.
reply
sonicmerlin @ 25th Aug 09:52PM:
Re: Looking Good

The article doesn't mention this, but costs have actually dropped in other countries, while ours have either remained flat or increased. A more accurate statistic then would be mbps/$, and without a doubt the US would fare even worse.
reply
mrkevin @ 25th Aug 11:16PM:
Re: I'm happy

said by sonicmerlin :

Strange how almost everything you and a few other users say is met with logic and rational thought.
I don't know what to say.
Maybe because I am logical and rational...just a thought.
--
An army of sheep led by a lion, will always defeat an army of lions led by a sheep.

reply
anon @ 26th Aug 08:55AM:
Re: Basic geography

Data for Poland aren't so bad: average tested download speed (»www.speedtest.net/global.php) is 3.3 Mbit/s.
Poland has no FTTH deployed so far, and the dominant access technology is DSL - currently up to 22 Mbit/s.
reply
Noah Vail @ 26th Aug 08:41AM:
Russia is a G20 member.

said by Karl Bode :

The group, with an obvious interest in increased broadband deployment, has long lamented the fact that the US is only industrialized country without a national policy...
So where do I go to find the National Broadband Policies for Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Argentina or Mexico?

NV
--
In my perfect religion, a giant hole appears and sucks up all the lousy people.
I call it the Crapture.

reply
Skippy25 @ 26th Aug 02:26PM:
Re: Comparison...

First I did not insult you, I simply pointed out the shear stupidity and lack of vision in your very short sighted comment. If you should be judged by this one comment, let me know.

I would be happy to debate this with you all day. Lets start with the fact that I am assuming there in Nebraska where you saw "that sign" you were on a road that was provided by the government weren't you? Or was this a dirt trail created by many other cars that traveled before you like back in the 1800's?

I will also assume that when you arrived 157 miles at that next service station you would be able to use their phone and they had electricity and running water all of which were there because they were REQUIRED to be there.

Or are you suggesting that a service station that is that remote earns enough money that it paid the 10,000's if not millions of dollars to provide all those services (road, phone, water, electricity) to itself and continues to bask in the cash to maintain those services?

Bring the debate on if you think you have one.
reply
Eat Me @ 26th Aug 05:48PM:
Re: Basic geography

said by sonicmerlin :

Verizon's Fios service thus far has been quite successful. Rural carriers who have been stringing out fiber over the last decade have also been successful. This proves there is in fact demand for FTTH.
FiOS is successful because they are aggressively marketing it and aggressively competing against cable. Put two computers, one connected to cable, one connected to fios and don't tell people which is which and they won't really be able to tell the difference, nor care about the difference.

The TV service is also a major draw to FiOS. Not only does it provide more channels but it is also cheaper in many places.
reply
pandora @ 26th Aug 10:14PM:
Re: Comparison...

said by Skippy25 :

First I did not insult you, I simply pointed out the shear stupidity and lack of vision in your very short sighted comment. If you should be judged by this one comment, let me know.

I would be happy to debate this with you all day. Lets start with the fact that I am assuming there in Nebraska where you saw "that sign" you were on a road that was provided by the government weren't you? Or was this a dirt trail created by many other cars that traveled before you like back in the 1800's?

I will also assume that when you arrived 157 miles at that next service station you would be able to use their phone and they had electricity and running water all of which were there because they were REQUIRED to be there.

Or are you suggesting that a service station that is that remote earns enough money that it paid the 10,000's if not millions of dollars to provide all those services (road, phone, water, electricity) to itself and continues to bask in the cash to maintain those services?

Bring the debate on if you think you have one.
I'll stand by my initial statement regarding your post - "There are jerks who unfortunately cast out insults and are unable to debate."
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."

reply
rainman_ @ 27th Aug 04:04AM:
Speed

This report should be viewed with a grain of salt. Distance to test point has a large impact on discoved data. I can take a speed test to my carriers local switch station 10 miles away or a dept of energy test site 1 mile away and get speed figures within 5% of the cap I pay to achieve. If I take another test in s korea I'm only getting 35% of my speed. I see no way you can set a standard for the results that are being reported, nor did I see an explanation of how they standardized their test results across the countries they tested. Of course many other factors play a role in the speed that broadband connections achieve. Most importantly, the choice to have a cheap and realitively slow connection. I know my isp will sell a $20 1.5 meg connection or a $65 20 meg connection and many speeds in between.

I'm curious to see what speeds are on the 4g cell networks when they start rolling out. I saw that DoCoMo reached 5/gb in tests about 6 months ago. I also wonder if they will start marketing to consumers or businesses for non-mobile access. I can't fathom a smartphone that could put speeds of that measure to any practical use.
reply
Skippy25 @ 27th Aug 10:56AM:
Re: Comparison...

LOL, I guess you have no grounds to stand on a debate with so you repost a little of nothing.

Well played, now tuck your tail and go hide under the bed.
reply
pandora @ 27th Aug 11:22AM:
Re: Comparison...

No Skippy,

I've done over 8,000 posts in these forums, and had more than my share of debates. Your antagonistic and insulting attitude aren't really demonstrating an interest in debate.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."

reply
bmialone @ 28th Aug 05:06AM:
Re: Zip Code

I live in Alaska and both broadband cable and Clearwire wireless are horrible compared to the other two states I lived in. Neither provide what they claim, both slow way down and become clogged in the evenings and are slow as mud on the weekends. Clearwire is so slow we can't even stream YouTube videos a lot of the time, it grinds to a halt, drops the connection, and it is often slower than the dial-up we used 15 years ago.

We can quibble over the numbers in the report, but the USA has fallen way behind, and Alaska is like going back in time.
reply
Skippy25 @ 30th Aug 03:21AM:
Re: Comparison...

Pathetic. If you can't debate it just say so. No reason to hide behind "I've done over 8,000 posts in these forums, and had more than my share of debates. Your antagonistic and insulting attitude aren't really demonstrating an interest in debate."
reply

Thank you for using lo-fi dslreports.com - report bugs
© 99-2009 silver matrix LLC